Jan R. Irvin. Are the two figures in the discs the Spirit of the Lord or Jesus?

 

The above taken from J.R. Irvin, The Holy Mushroom: Evidence of Mushrooms in Judeo-Christianity (Appendix by Jack Herer; Grand Terrace, CA: Gnostic Media, 2008), (unpaginated kindle edition). The tree is a mushroom tree in the sense of a stylized trees are called a Pilzbaum, i.e., a mushroom or umbrella-shaped tree. But it does not represent a psychedelic mushroom, which is what Irvin and others argue.  

Mushrooms don't have branches, much less multiple heads on multiple branches. But more to the point mushrooms are cryptogams, that is to say, they have seeds or fruit. And yet this tree has fruit hanging from it, as does the much faded one in the previous scene. The fruit relates to the fact that the previous scene illustrates the Latin Vulgate text of Genesis 1:11-12: "Let the earth bring forth the green herb, and such as may seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after its kind, which may have seed in itself upon the earth. And it was so done. And the earth brought forth the green herb, and such as yieldeth seed according to its kind, and the tree that beareth fruit, having seed each one according to its kind. And God saw that it was good".

The two discs in the better-preserved scene does not represent "the spirit of the lord or Jesus, peering down."  It illustrates the fourth creation day where we read in Genesis 1:14-16:

"And God said: Let there be lights made in the firmament of heaven, to divide the day and the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years: To shine in the firmament of heaven, and to give light upon the earth. And it was so done. And God made two great lights: a greater light to rule the day; and a lesser light to rule the night: and the stars."

In this case the sun and moon are personified as Sol and Luna. This personification of the Son and Moon are extremely common throughout the Carolingian, Ottonian, and Romanesque period. Multiple examples could easily be provided, but the point of these posts is to briefly describe individual examples of the many erroneous interpretations put forward by those who claim to find psychedelic mushrooms hidden in Medieval art. 

Irvin's unfamiliarity with the fact that the discs represent Sol and Luna undermines whatever he significance he wanted to insinuate by claiming that the "spirit of the lord being held above it," i.e., the tree.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John A. Rush, The Ghent Altarpiece. Is that a mushroom at the base of the fountain?

Image
  Here is Plate 3:63c from  John A. Rush, The Mushroom in Christian Art (Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 2011).   John A. Rush presents an extremely poor-quality blow-up of the bottom of the fountain (lower right) from the Ghent Altarpiece, urging his readers to "Notice the mushroom at the base of the fountain."  This echoes the text of the book itself where he says the same thing and credits Jan Irvin for the information (p. 250).  As is so often the case, it is impossible for the viewer to tell whether what Rush says is true from the photo he provides. It is wholly worthless for verification of what Rush is claiming.  Here is a better picture revealing that it is not a mushroom, as Rush claims, but a water-spouting mascaron.
Read more

Psychedelic Mushrooms in Christian Art? John A. Rush

Image
John A. Rush who taught Anthropology at Sierra College, Rocklin, California. Rush example represents the first kind issue, namely something he has simply gotten conspicuously wrong:  In his book  Failed God: Fractured Myth in a Fragile World  (Berkeley, CA: Frog Books, 2008), John A. Rush, uses a certain mosaic he saw in St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice as a sort of launching pad for the work.  We read in his preface: On July 13, 2001, I entered St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice, Italy, and was overwhelmed by the beauty of the mosaics.  As I moved along, I noticed an arch with a curious scene (see from cover).  There was Jesus with the cap of  Amanita muscaria , the sacred mushroom, in his hand (pp. xix-x). The image of the mosaic on the cover is not clear enough to tell whether what Rush said was true or not (Fig. 1).  But a clearer one will be presented below. Fig. 1 But in truth Rush saw no such thing, and the fact that he claimed he did reveals...
Read more